|
 |

Archive for February, 2008
Will you be at ConExpo-ConAgg?
Posted by Jack from Birmingham, AL, US on February 21, 2008
Chuck - I have some fairly long-winded questions about potential wear part improvements and thought I might be able to ask you in person at ConExpo. Are you going to ConExpo? If not, who should I talk to at your company’s booth?
Yes – someone from our well experienced (20 years minimum) technical staff will be in attendance all days of ConExpo – Steve Dolezal, Terry Whisel, or myself. We’ll be looking forward to seeing you there.
Crusher Discharge Setting
Posted by Richard from Little Rock, AR, US on February 13, 2008
What is the best way to determine a crusher’s discharge setting?
There’s a couple ways to go about this, with a fair number of people preferring either method.
One is the physical discharge setting method. This is done by passing a compressible material such as a lead slug or aluminum can through a running empty crusher and measuring the thickness of the passed test material. The crusher is then locked at a physical closed side setting that provides the desired finished material size.
Another method that’s becoming more common is setting the discharge close to what’s anticipated as the desired setting on a physical basis, and then running it full of material to be crushed. The crusher is adjusted either open or closed, until the desired discharge product is obtained. The power requirement in ampere draw is noted and the crusher is run at that rate until the finished product size changes due to liner wear and the amp figure needs re-evaluated. This method is common among jaw, cone and roll crushers.
Liner Design for Specific Material
Posted by Lloyd from Kamloops, MB, CA on February 11, 2008
We have a pioneer crusher 4248 and we are wondering what would be the best liner design for crushing Sheelite, marble, chert, Granite argalite. Thanks.
The presence of chert in the material being reduced indicates a silica content that will have a bearing on the alloy best suited to what you’re crushing.
The general rule we use to determine best alloy choice (carbon/manganese levels) is partially based on the silica content of the crushed material. At a silica content exceeding .4, the value of using the high alloy manganese materials diminishes.
Regarding the design of the jaw dies themselves -- one of the high tooth jaw designs we have available would be most appropriate. The more abrasive the material being crushed, the more beneficial a higher tooth form becomes. High tooth jaw dies are available in various curve rates (dependent on sizing requirements) and with tooth depths varying from 3.000 inches to 5.000 inches, based on common coarse 6-inch tooth pitches.
In order to make the very best choice in jaw dies, the questions we’d ask are:
1. What is the very top size feed material going to the crusher in 2 axis?
2. What size range does 50% of the gross feed material fall into?
3. What is the desired finish product size from this crusher?
4. What is the silica content and compressive strength of the material being reduced?
5. What is the nature of the material being crushed (shot rock, any slabs, naturals, and are the fines minus the discharge settings scalped from the feed material)?
That Pioneer crusher you have is a good piece of equipment, and a lot of replacement wear parts have been developed for it. Our customer service department can help you with a specific choice, or you can contact our engineering department here as well. Thanks for the question -- and yes there’s a ready solution.
|