Q/A Archives

February 2010

M T W T F S S
« Jan   Apr »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728

Sign-up for RSS

Sign-up for RSS

Columbia Steel Casting Co., Inc.

Crusher Wear Parts

sponsored by Columbia Steel Casting Co., Inc.

Archive for February, 2010

Jaw Dies for Eagle Austin Western 20 x 36
Posted by mike from kennewick, WA, VI on February 12, 2010

My current arrangement produces to much oversize output. What is best

and most economical way to reduce size of output to the smallest possible?

Before one can answer this question there are a few items that must be examined.

First, what is the condition of the jaws? Jaws typically show higher wear towards the center than the sides. The discharge setting is typically determined by the distance between the stationary and movable jaw, by measuring between the crowns. As the jaws wear down the sides dictate just how closed the stationary can be adjusted to the movable. Therefore, it is not uncommon for a set of jaws to have a discharge setting 2-3 inches greater when it is worn than when it is new.

The second consideration is related to the length of toggle plate. Since most of a crusher’s product size is related to the discharge setting, is there enough adjustment in the crusher to allow one to decrease the close side setting to attain a “finer” product?

If the jaws are relatively new and there is enough adjustment left in the crusher, than one needs to address the gradation with designs. Typically the greater the tooth pitch the coarser the product. If the tooth pitch was 4” and a “finer” product is desired, than a 2” tooth pitch may help.


1